|
|
||||||||
| Best Management Practices I Afforestation I Water Quality I Wildlife Mgt I Land Access | ||||||||
| When it comes time to remove trees Bennett's foresters manage with a light touch, removing unhealthy trees and planning for the needs of future forests. Most harvests are the result of sanitation cuts or thinning, the removals of diseased and feeble trees to improve forest health. All harvest prescriptions favor leaving healthy native tree species, assuming trees that evolved with the site are best suited to grow on it. Our foresters use a variety of silvicultural prescriptions to assure biologic diversity, protect water quality, maintain wildlife habitat, and preserve visual quality. |
||||||||
| As pointed out by the Interior Columbia Basin Ecosystem Management Project, the species composition of many of our forests has changed due to past forest management, disease, and fire suppression. Low elevation pine forests have largely been replaced with firs, White Pine has been decimated by blister rust, and Western Larch has been greatly decreased by the elimination of stand replacing burns. Today's forests have an overabundance of Douglas Fir and Grand Fir, often at densities too great to sustain, resulting in widespread insect and disease outbreaks and an increased risk of uncontrollable fire. |
![]() |
|||||||
| Forest health in the inland Columbia basin can only be restored by returning to management practices favoring native tree species grown in naturally occurring conditions. Bennett has adopted practices to encourage a predominance of Ponderosa Pine on lower elevation sites, the planting of blister rust resistant White Pine where historically present and an increase in Western Larch plantations. |
||||||||